Re: Maintainer Responsibility Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 15:10 +0200, Xavier Lamien wrote:
> 2008/5/6 Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>         
>         === Miscellaneous Items ===
>              * Maintainers need to maintain an upgrade path for their
>                packages.
>                      * F(current-1) -> F(current) -> Rawhide
>              * Packages should be pushed to the Rawhide branch first.
>         If it
>                builds and works fine for a few days, then it can be
>         pushed to
>                F(current). If there is a good reason to push it to
>                F(current-1), it should be done after a few days of
>         being in
>                F(current).
> 
> I think you should also mention the act of "pushing to testing" repo
> for each current fedora release.

Yeah, that's not a bad idea. I believe when that section was written,
Bodhi wasn't even around (which tells you how long this proposal has
been around).  I'll add a note.

Thanks,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux