Re: FESCo Proposal for blocking older version of autoconf & automake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 23:43 -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> The gain is we decide what to keep and what not to keep based on who 
> actually is willing to fight to keep it around rather than whoever feels 
> like complaining on devel list. Its a corollary to "its easier to 
> apologize than to ask permission," the people who notice the change are 
> a tiny and far more important subset than the people who will complain 
> ahead of time.

It doesn't account for the developers who will have failures, notice we
don't package a version of autoconf anymore and say "Screw that" and
move to some other development platform which does support what they
need.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux