Re: Fedora Package Status of May 3, 2008

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "CI" == Christian Iseli <Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxx> writes:

CI> tibbs, to get a better view of non-sponsors with many reviews, I
CI> have increased the Top listings to 50.  I thought this was
CI> simplest to implement.  If you have other ideas, I'll gladly try
CI> them out :)

It sure helps.  I was thinking of either separating out the
non-sponsor reviews or picking a cutoff of something like 100 reviews
and sticking those above it into a Hall of Fame or semis.  There's
really no point in a dick size war once you get that far up into the
stratosphere, and we could probably do without the hilariously huge
bug lists.  Clicking on the one next to my name gets me "This list is
too long for Bagel's little mind".

In any case, now I have plenty of people to investigate for
sponsorship status.  That, and 37 "nobody" tickets to clean up.
Thanks for doing this.

 - J<

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux