Re: is xorg.conf still needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 02 May 2008 08:39:46 am Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2008-05-01, 03:29 GMT, dwight at supercomputer.org wrote:
> > Are we really? Upon what do you base that statement? I'd be
> > very interested in knowing more, because the Stateless Linux
> > mailing list looks rather inactive. Is there a roadmap? And
> > what's the current status?
>
> I used “Stateless Linux” in very open meaning of the word. AFAIK
> it is now more state of mind, than a real project.
>
> Matěj

Thanks for clarifying that. From my point of view, I'm talking about 
real code, as currently implemented. Hopefully we have that all 
cleared up.

   -dwight-

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux