On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:53:43 -0400, Adam Jackson <ajackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There's a detail here for outputs, which is that we don't always do > sensible things if we try to start X with no monitor attached, and for > some KVMs it's tough to tell the difference between not attached and > merely not active. That's just a bug though. Or even when the code knows a monitor is attached, but it doesn't do EDID. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
