On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 15:21 -0400, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008 3:03:05 am Christian Iseli wrote:
> >
> > Given that we are packaging for a specific distro, I think the case
> > could even be argued that the packager should replace all
> > #! /usr/bin/env <interpreter>
> > with
> > #! /usr/bin/<interpreter>
> > to make the distro consistent.
> >
>
> -1:
>
> the distro already consistently uses /usr/bin/env, and I vote to keep it that
> way. :)
% for i in /usr/bin/*; do
head -1 $i | fgrep 'python';
done | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
109 #!/usr/bin/python
33 #!/usr/bin/env python
13 #!/usr/bin/python -tt
8 #! /usr/bin/env python
4 #! /usr/bin/python -E
3 #!/usr/bin/python
3 #! /usr/bin/python
3 #! /usr/bin/env python2.5
2 #!/usr/bin/python -t
2 #!/usr/bin/python2.5
1 #!/usr/bin/python -O
1 #! /usr/bin/python2.5 -OOt
1 #!/usr/bin/env python2.5
...I think you meant to say "+1 the distro. consistently doesn't
use /usr/bin/env now".
Not forgetting that it's a significant bug to use /usr/bin/env with
anything security related.
--
James Antill <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
