On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:04:07PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > As Bill said - the whitelist is just pain to maintain. So, if we want > something like this then we make it a tag at the rpm level. Heck, you > can have it be a rather innocuous provides that we could hack into yum > to look for: > > Provides: look-for-i386-too The i386 Gtk IM plugins wouldn't be used if gtk2.i386 isn't installed, right? Similarly PAM i386 modules aren't needed when pam.i386 isn't installed and NSS i386 modules when glibc.i[36]86 isn't installed. In that case it would be best if this kind of dependency was somehow encoded in the packages, rather than just forcing installation of unneeded i386 packages. Jakub -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
