On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 11:31 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > I know this is just a temporary hack (the GIGANTIC HACK wording in the > patch gave it away for me :) :-) > , but can the wording here be changed to > be a little more accurate? You don't "install" signatures. What's > being installed (or perhaps imported, rather) is the repository's key. > Maybe something more like the following wording for the two strings > above: Yes, the wording in master is much better. If you want to do UI review then use a master or wait for 0.2.0 - 0.1.x is in "don't break me" bugfix mode. > This doesn't seem to be in the upstream git anywhere yet, else I'd have > sent a more thorough patch to replace signature with key where it > seems appropriate. Perhaps the anon-git server just hasn't been > synced yet today? Well, that patch is RH specific, as quite frankly, it's shite. You want to see the UI in master - its much better. When the panic for F9 has slowed, I'll roll 0.2.0 and put it into updates-testing. Hopefully we can tie into seahorse as well at that point. Of course, the user shouldn't have to deal with this signatures rubbish - I don't see why we can't sign the fedora and fedora-updates key by default anyway... Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
