Re: is xorg.conf still needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/04/2008, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  That's far from ideal and breaks quite often (for example with some
> proprietary games that have a hard coded rpath to libGL.so.1). I hope Fedora
> and Livna/RPM Fusion can work out a better solution in the future to avoid
> that mess. Steward (he maintains the fglrx and nvidia drivers in Livna) some
> months ago on this list suggested to switch to using alternatives for
> libGL.so.1, but he didn't get much (or any?) feedback on that. :-/

"/usr/lib/libGL.so.1" is, well, a well-established ABI, basically.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux