On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Nigel Jones <dev@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have no problem with it, BUT, (and I speak personally here), there are > some people that will not use it because it's just too big (500MB is > larger than some of the monthly data transfer caps in New Zealand > (200MB/mo), I personally, only have 700MB/day. > This sounds like a new yum plugin. "Cap my downloads to X/day" so that packages that are larger than that cap get marked etc. > Also remember that even though it may produce a 500MB noarch rpm, it also > means quite likely a 500MB srpm making it 1 gig in total. > > Another consideration would be the size of the community behind > vegastrike, if we have 100+ then thats great, if it's only 10 then I > become doubtful over it's usefulness in regards to resources. (Don't get > me wrong, just trying to put a slightly different perspective on it.) > > Just my two cents, > > Nigel > > > On Fri, April 25, 2008 6:59 pm, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm planning on updating vegastrike to the new 0.5.0 upstream release for > > F-10 > > and maybe later F-9 / F-8 too, but vegastrike has been dead for a while > > and now > > makes some huge changes, so better to keep the old trusted version for F-8 > > / > > F-9 for a while. > > > > > However the 0.5.0 datafiles are 500 Mb b2zipped! So is this a problem? > > > > Regards, > > > > Hans > > > > -- > > > > fedora-devel-list mailing list > > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > > > > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
