On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:28:08AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Can you please fix this, this blocks X other bugs. I'm sorry todo this, but > consider this your first ping in the light of the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMaintainers > > Which sometimes gets people attention and sometimes not. I guess the > NonResponsiveMaintainers policy is already an answer to this, which is why > I use it, but I wonder if it is _the_ answer. No, it is not the answer, since the prerequisite is: When a Fedora member notices that a maintainer isn't answering their bugs, not answering rebuild requests, emails or the like, they need to file a bug against the package in bugzilla asking for the maintainer to respond. This bug should list the outstanding issues they need to address. and it is not the case here. Agreed the problem is similar, but, in my opinion, different. As I told in another mail, here we want to be able to force maintainers, while the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy is here to detect missing maintainer who will never need to be forced since they are missing. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
