Re: New vegastrike for F-10: 500MB !! ??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:09:57 +0200 (CEST), Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

> 
> Le Ven 25 avril 2008 10:47, Jakub Jelinek a écrit :
> 
> > For Live CD it is obviously out of the question, it wouldn't even fit
> > there, but even in the Everything trees 500MB of data for a game is
> > IMHO too much.
> 
> Can't the data set be broken out in several packages ?

And then? Have several packages which create a weird dep-chain?
Or make it a pain for the user to hunt for such packages?
 
> > Remember many people mirror the whole Everything tree to do
> > local installs etc.
> 
> That just means we need more granular repositories, with one
> repository devoted to big lumps of optional resources like game data,
> artwork (images/audio/video), artistic fonts, document templates,
> cliparts, etc

Last time that was discussed briefly [a few years ago], no solution was
found. While you can separate [game] run-time from [game] data and put the
huge data pkgs into a separate repository, you don't want to enable that
repository by default, because that would cause yum to download even more
metadata. The run-time portion would need to depend on a disabled external 
repository and warn about missing data.

Putting all games into one "Games" repo may work for some time until a
game pkg builds a library that is used by a pkg in another repo. Mapping
the comps groups into a repository hierarchy leads to much more complex
inter-repository dependencies and the necessity to maintain additional
lists for the "package name -> repository" mapping (or reuse the RPM spec
Group). The same applies to creating separate repositories for
"mandatory", "recommended" and "optional". They will keep growing anyway.

> IMHO it's good to have more FLOSS stuff packaged and we should not
> limit our ecosystem - that would put Fedora to a huge competitive
> disadvantage WRT entities with no such qualms.

The "Everything" repo is huge already. When will that be a reason to be 
concerned?

-- 
Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) - Linux 2.6.23.15-137.fc8
loadavg: 1.11 1.21 1.33

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux