On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 01:24:12AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 04:43 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 21:58 -0200, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote: > > > > > ifconfig, ip, fdisk, chkconfig and a lot of the other examples listed in > > > this thread, makes perfectly sense to me, but not all. > > > > Why? Most of them are tools which most ordinary users will never need > > You mean like: > > /bin/dumpkeys > /bin/ed > /bin/login > /usr/bin/xcutsel > /usr/bin/xdpr > /usr/bin/zzuf > [ ... etc. ... ] > > > nor will they be permitted to let them perform actual actions. > > Ahh, so more like: > > /bin/redhat_lsb_init > /bin/unicode_start > /bin/ypdomainname > /usr/bin/webalizer > /usr/bin/xenU_workflow.py > [ ... etc. ... ] Yes, some of these definitely belong to sbin, not to say even libexec. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpQIgMvv7pxi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
