On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 03:01:25PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 02:49:02PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > > > Once upon a time, traceroute was in sbin and *that* got fixed. I don't > > > > see any reason we can't fix the other _tiny handful_ of commands this > > > > affects. (Especially if the sudo securepath option is also enabled, > > > > which reduces the number further.) > > > "The perfect is the enemy of the good" --Voltaire > > Err, sure. So let's make it good. That's my side of the argument, right? :) > Heh, no. The good is the two-line change to the setup package to make > things better. That would be true if it didn't make things _worse_. :) But that aside, in this case, the quote in this case should be changed to "the mediocre/poor is the enemy of the good", because once /sbin and /usr/sbin are crammed into everyone's path, there's never going to be any incentive to put programs in sensible places. We'd still have /usr/sbin/traceroute. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list