On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:12:05AM -0400, Ken Dreyer wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I was hoping the Fedora Apache maintainers would consider including > > the following patch into httpd for F9 (or F10): > > > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34607 > > > > specifically, the patch for httpd 2.2.x is: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/httpd-2.2.x-sni.diff > > > > This feature would really open up mod_ssl for certain name-based > > virtualhost situations. It requires OpenSSL >= 0.9.8f, but F9 already > > has 0.9.8g! > > I'd recommend you file it as a bug in bugzila, note it is an enhancement > request. This way the apache maintainers/co-maintainers will see it > and be reminded regularly when they look at bugzilla. Thanks for the recommendation, I did so here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443513 > How likely is apache 2.4 to be released before the feature freeze for > Fedora 10 (e.g. ~4-5 months from now), whereby Fedora could pick this > up "for free" then? I wish I knew! httpd is not on a timed release schedule. Earlier this month on the httpd dev list there was a rather long discussion on that subject, but from what I could tell they didn't reach a consensus. - Ken -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
