Re: gnumeric - never reviewed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, 21 April 2008 at 04:56, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> Denis Leroy wrote:
> > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 00:33 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >>> Hi.
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to submit EL-4/5 CVS branch requests for gnumeric, but I
> >>> can't find
> >>> the review bug. Has it ever been reviewed?
> >>
> >> No, it was in core pre-merge, and it looks like it never got tagged for
> >> a Merge Review. Someone should fix that (I call not it).
> > 
> > If the new maintainer wants to open a merge review bug, I'll be happy to
> > do the review.
> > 
> > -denis
> > 
> Since Hans is a little busy, I have taken over as the maintainer of
> gnumeric. I am also going to do a rebuild of the same with psiconv
> support, once psiconv is pushed to stable.

Great! Would you be willing to maintain the EL branches as well?
If not, are you OK with me maintaining them? As I said earlier, I need
them both.

Regards,
R.

-- 
Fedora contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski
Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux