Le Lun 21 avril 2008 19:25, Dan Williams a écrit : > On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 13:16 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:45:02PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote: >> > Mark any devices that you do not want to control with >> NetworkManager >> > with NM_CONTROLLED=no in the ifcfg file for that device. Of >> course that >> > makes the device unmanaged by NM, and therefore it will never be >> your >> > default route, but it might work for you if you want to keep using >> NM. >> >> How does NM choose the device to use for the default route? I had a >> problem with NM choosing the device that has NO default route over >> the >> one that has a default route. > > Latest activated wired device, then wireless, then GSM/CDMA. AutoIPv4 > devices never get the default route. Do you by chance have a device > that's not really connected to anything? That's pretty common in home networks where the trusty linux desktop bridges/NATs the brittle home lan to the wild internet. The wired connection to the LAN is therefore a dead end. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
