Stepan Kasal wrote:
I would rather continue using FAS but drop the CLA requirement for a fedorahosted account.Hello, On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:21:52PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:[...] (having to sign the Fedora CLA [to get access to fedorahosted]indeed, that is the problem. FSF often askes contributors to transfer the copyrights to them. And it is controversial, and FSF has to accept exceptions in some cases. And FSF is a non-profit, whose stated goal is to promote free software. Why should people have this level of trust to Red Hat, Inc., whose stated goal is to generate maximal profit for the shareholders? So it seems that to lower the enter barrier, we should _not_ use FAS for fedorahosted.org.
-Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
