On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 08:10:42AM +0200, David Nielsen wrote: > 2008/4/20, Nigel Jones <dev@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Just an FYI that I intend to adopt banshee > > (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/banshee) so this is > > just a courtesy message per the adoption policy. I've offered it to spot > > (who last updated it) via IRC so I'll await his reply before continuing. > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Nigel > > > > I would recommend taking libipoddevice and podsleuth as well, they are > isolated dependencies that will normally require bumps at the same time and > they are really low impact. There's an advantage to the Banshee maintainer > owning the entire stack. Also thank you for picking this up.. I owe you a > beer. Likewise for ipod-sharp, as iirc banshee as of 0.13.2 requires podsleuth and ipod-sharp, but not libipoddevice. > > - David > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -James
Attachment:
pgpbBcSU5ZCI1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
