Le Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:09:33 -0400, "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 13:12 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > But you could submit it to > > fedora, if you are ready to do all the backporting of serious bugs, > > especially security bugs. > > > Actually, speaking as the former maintainer for compat-wxGTK-2.4*... I > would really advise against it. In the wx space, this ancient piece of > unmaintained junk conflicts heavily with the later wxGTK releases, to > the point where you cannot effectively have the 2.4 compat package and > any later wx packages on a system at the same time without both sets > of wx dependent applications either failing to work entirely or > randomly crashing. Not good, even though I never found such problem. > > Tell upstream for this proprietary bomb that 2003 has long since moved > on, and they should port to either a more modern version of wx, or a > different toolkit. > Impossible. This is an old fortran 77 / wxGTK software. It's barely alive and many people need it including me :) http://www.xtl.ox.ac.uk/crystals.html Regards, Pascal -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
