Re: pruning the fonts list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Warren Togami (wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> I'm afraid most wins are in 3. 5. 6. & 7., and they depend on l10n
>> groups telling us their wishes, which unfortunately has not happened a
>> lot so far. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Triaging/L10N
>> remains terribly incomplete.
>>
>
> Even if you had full knowledge of fonts safe to remove from the LiveCD
> (because they are good enough for web browsing), this introduces an
> additional problem of incomplete language coverage in Live installs.

The suggestion was not to remove any language coverage - the suggestion
was to remove:

1) core fonts which none of the apps on the LiveCD use
2) *duplicate* fonts for language coverage

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux