Patrice Dumas wrote:
Hello,
It would be nice to solve the issues raised in the merge reviews of
those basic packages. It is on hold since some months.
In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 Robert Scheck
proposed to remove basesystem, have setup depend on filesystem, and
glibc depend on setup.
I think this is a good idea. Any feedback?
--
Pat
Hi Patrice.
I've written a comment in the bz as well, but i think the order should
rather be:
basesystem
setup
filesystem
or, in case we decide to drop basesystem (i'm all for it btw, no reason
to keep it hanging around for no reason):
glibc: Requires(Pre) filesystem
filesystem: Requires(Pre) setup
which would end up being:
setup
filesystem
glibc
In case we drop it though we need to add
Obsoletes: basesystem-x-y
Provides: basesystem-x-y
to filesystem in order to have a consistent behavior and a proper chain
for updates, too.
Thoughts?
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Team Lead Core Services | Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch <pknirsch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hauptstaetterstr. 58 | Web: http://www.redhat.com/
D-70178 Stuttgart, Germany | IT executives: Red Hat #1 in value. Again.
| http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
