Re: packages without internet source in fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:46:59PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> 
> Obligating anyone to do anything with regard to how they choose to set
> up what is essentially a new fork of a dead codebase is
> absolutely..wrong.
> 
> If you want to always require that a codebase in the Fedora repository
> has an identifiable upstream source location that's reasonable.  But

Indeed. That's the point. And then I don't want to force people, but
push a model where we collaborate with other distros when reviving dead
upstream. I really don't want to mandate something, but help those
facing such case with documentation and procedure to lower information
barrier and help coordinating with other distros in a case I think it
makes sense.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux