Re: packages without internet source in fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 16:21 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 16:18 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 16:14 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 22:00 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > > * missing upstream: I think that fedorahosted is not right, a distro
> > > >   neutral place should in my opinion be better.
> > > 
> > > I don't really feel that way.  That'd be like saying code.google.com
> > > isn't neutral because they also do a linux distro (or have threatened
> > > to)
> > 
> > maybe I'm confused - I can see some concern about distro-specific
> > locations for abandoned/orphaned upstreams. But not for apps for whom
> > their upstream is hosted in fedorahosted. for those - it should be fine
> > - and not matter about the distro.
> > 
> > -sv
> > 
> 
> Maybe I'm just jaded that fedorahosted is too 'distro specific'.  I
> didn't want it to be, but I guess that's what you get when "fedora" is
> attached to the name.  (having to sign the Fedora CLA to get an account
> doesn't help much either...)

the latter bit is the only concerning part for most people, I think.

-sv


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux