Re: More Java guidelines questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 18:10 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Do you have an estimate for the man-hours of modifications it took to make that possible to help others decide on the feasibility of using gcj instead of Sun Java in general?

I don't, but that's a moot point because Fedora couldn't ship Sun Java.
I'd like to think that a lot of the work that went into GCJ aided in the
push to get Sun to open up Java so that we /could/ ship it.

Well Fedora not including Sun Java was cited as one the major reasons why Sun choose to open source Java and specifically under GPL

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9624

As to the amount of effort that took for Eclipse to run under GCJ

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7413

Rahul

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux