Re: Mono Package audit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "TC" == Tom \"spot\" Callaway  writes:

TC> On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 23:15 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 22:46 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> 
> > It will not cleanly build against the provided nunit, and there is
>> no good way to do an override.
>> 
>> Welp, I have an idea. Not entirely done yet.

TC> Got it!

Excellent.  I guess this means that boo can then be rebuilt and
finally tagged to fix the broken dep.

TC> These packages need reviews... quickly.

TC> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442055

Took review.  A question: is this package necessary for building nant,
because nant is listed as BuildRequires.  Does there need to be some
kind of bootstrapping to get this to build if there is no nant
initially?

Alex

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux