Re: Mono Package audit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/4/10 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx>:

>  How is that better than checking and scrubbing on each build?

1) It's more flexible when we want to add a check for some other
problem besides dlls
2) There is a way for maintainers to override it sanely if need be; we
really want fewer hardcoded macros (c.f. the discussion about
overriding the debuginfo stuff)
3) It moves us towards fixing our current model where there is a very
high bar to entry, but a very low bar to further changes.  You could
imagine for example that our process would block a package from being
distributed that added an rpmlint regression unless it was
peer-reviewed.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux