On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 18:43 -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > My comments were entirely accurate. I think you owe me an apology on list. > To complain about be being inaccurate when you haven't actually *tried* > the things and I have is most peculiar behaviour. Just for funsies I attempted a text mode install in an i386 KVM guest with 128 megs of ram. Using today's rawhide boot.iso (which has stage2 on it) and pointing it at an http mirror. Guess what, the install completed fine, and booted after the fact. I picked a minimal package set from the package selector (included vim-enhanced though). That's still 428~ packages. So why do you have to go through gyrations to install Fedora on 128 meg machines? Or why do you have to install something other than Fedora? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
