Quoth Jonathan Underwood: > On 07/04/2008, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 19:48 +0000, =?ISO-8859-1?Q? J=F3hann_B._Gu=F0mundsson _ wrote: > > > So exactly what, of Alan suggestions are not necessary for a 128MB ( low > > > men machine ) > > > And how do you come to the conclusion that he's throwing hate at fedora? > > > > > > First, the post was about less than 512, and my ps3 certainly has less > > (256). A network install using rescue.img (renamed to netinst.iso or > > boot.iso partway through the F9 development process) and nfs or http > > works fine for me. I may have to do text or vnc installs, I don't > > recall. Also selecting fewer packages helps, but you want fewer > > packages anyway. For 128 it may get harder, I haven't tried that small > > in a while, but that's a far cry from < 512. > > > There used to be a project whose aim was to install Fedora on low > memory machines - the approach was to use a different installer. For > the life of me I can't remember or find the name of that project > though. RULE / Slinky. http://rule-project.org/ Regards, -- Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
