Denis Leroy wrote: > Wart wrote: >> Matt Domsch wrote: >>> Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 >>> using rawhide from 3/29 and for any failures, again with 3/31 >>> >>> Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ >>> >>> Total packages: 5500 >>> Number failed to build: 304 >>> Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 13 >>> Leaving: 291 >>> (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package) >>> >> [...] >>> wart: sear >> >> This depends on libsigc++20, which was upgraded from 2.0.x to 2.2.2, >> which broke backwards compatibility in some cases. Did I miss an >> announcement of this somewhere? > > Yes my apologies for this. libsigc++20 2.2 turned off support for the > deprecated 1.2 API, and that wasn't made very clear whth 2.2.0 came out. > I just sent you a patch for sear that compiles for me. > > A quick howto to port to the 2.0 API > > 1) email me :-) > > or > > 2) install and run regexxer. regexxer is your friend. > > look for occurences of 'SigC::slot'. These must be replaced with > 'sigc::mem_fun' if it has 2 arguments, or 'sigc::ptr_fun' if it has one > arg. > > 'Sigc::Signal' should be replaced with 'sigc::signal' > > 'Sigc::Object' is replaced by 'sigc::trackable'. > > Generally, any use of 'SigC' instead of 'sigc' will cause a failure. Many thanks for the patch! I've successfully rebuilt sear and sent the patch upstream. Regards, --Wart -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
