On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 11:19 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > If you check your ifcfg files, do they have NM_CONTROLLED=false in them? > > lovely....does that automatically get added in the false state as the > default if I run the damn legacy tool and build an ifcfg file with it? I _think_ so, yes. Not sure about that, Harald would be better to ask. We do need to make s-c-n/ifup/ifdown and NM play better together. Dan > I totally missed that checkbox, because i didn't edit the device > properties. That's what I get for trying to help other people > troubleshoot the legacy network configuration stuff. Now that its > pointed out, its obvious. But hey the hooks to prevent NM for messing > with the legacy configuration work, so that's good...even though I'm a > dorkus for not seeing it. > > -jef"Another default setting choice to be argued over for several > releases"spaleta > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
