On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 10:14 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 20:16 +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote: > > > bouml-doc: > > > F8-updates > F9 (0:3.4-1 > 0:3.0-2) > > > > It does not use a DistTag so the package in F-8 updates should be > > inherited in F-9/Rawhide too. Jesse Keating usually does some magic > > and takes care of this every time there is a new update. > > Erm... no. disttag has nothing to do with koji inheritance. The only > time rawhide will inherit a package from dist-f8-updates is if there > isn't already any form of that package in dist-rawhide. > > And you _really_ shouldn't be relying on inheritance anyway. We want > packages in F9 to be built against F9, not F8. > > > I have just requested a new bouml-doc-4.2-1 to be pushed into F-7 updates: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/FEDORA-2008-2856 > > > > So it might be better if we made sure this one gets inherited > > correctly into F-8 and F-9/Rawhide instead of bothering with the older > > package. > > No. Build the package properly for each release. > > josh To be fair, this is one of those packages that we do want inheritance to work. It's a noarch doc package that really doesn't need to be "rebuilt" X times and be upgraded needlessly for people when moving from one dist to another. I'll look into why the inheritance isn't working right. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
