Pavel Khardikov wrote:
Izhar Firdaus пишет:Same goes for me, but looking Mockups, It looks a lot like PackageDB, but with an improved UI .. so, in my mind, rather than making MyFedora take PackageDB's ( http://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb | https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ ) work, why dont extend PackageDB? .. PackageDB code is already out there .. revamp the UI, add more features .. I used the name "PackageWebUI" was because thats the title in the Fedora GSOC Idea page .. but I would prefer an approach of improving pkgdb rather than writing a new one.. my.fedoraproject.org / MyFedora - the name sounds more like a Fedora AIO to me, and thats also what i understand from "my.fedoraproject.org is a project to integrate all of the Fedora infrastructure in one place. The goal is to create a modular web page in which each module would pull views from the various Fedora resources and display them to the user.", and one of those modules, could be an integration to PkgDB/PackageWebUI .. Unix philosophy: "Write programs that do one thing and do it well." .. PkgDB focuses on packages, MyFedora focuses on integrating the rest of Fedora infrastructure. Of course, provide a way for all of them to communicate with each other (JSON,XMLRPC,whatever). Or do J5 have different view about this?, both idea ( improve MyFedora / improve PackageDB ) sounds okay to me, just that I feel that if MyFedora implements those features, PackageDB and the effort made for it previously would be rendered of no-use (or perhaps thats what one of MyFedora's goal - to obsolete packagedb ) ..I agree with you.IMHO, need to use as a basis packagedb (revamp the UI, add more features, etc).Make it pretty and convenient for users.
I've clarified the Package WebUI idea a bit [1]_Basically, the data is going to need to reside in the PackageDB. MyFedora may choose to pull that information out as raw data or as an import of the PackageDB UI. We'll have to evaluate that later. the focus of this particular project would be to provide a task or application oriented interface to the information in rpms. This will require a fair bit of additional db schema as the current schema is oriented towards packages and we'll want to pull information about programs, libraries, etc out of the packages.
There are other possible projects revolving around the packagedb and myfedora. For instance, the PackageDB UI is in desperate need of a clean up (the present UI is what I threw together to make the intial release.) If someone wanted to take the time to mockup a new UI and implement the html templates/javascript functions to make it work, that would be a much needed project as well.
.. _[1]: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SummerCoding/2008/Ideas#head-fc035207c713afb64340dc9c1fdfcda3ae963f53
-Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
