On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 17:44 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 19:19 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Josh Boyer <jwboyer <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > I have another proposal I'm in the middle of writing for how to deal > > > with negative karma votes. It's essentially "negative karma votes > > > require a bugzilla entry". > > > > That's a bad idea, the reason for a negative karma vote is not always a bug, > > for example, packages can be -1ed for reasons like "this shouldn't go out > > before package Y goes out, please either add Y to this update or hold it until > > the Y update gets pushed". > > +1. Ok, two things: 1) You're commenting and plus-1'ing a proposal completely separate from the one in the subject that hasn't even been written yet. Please hold off on that or start a new thread. 2) The reason cited above should be considered a bug in bodhi, because depsolving should be done before it's allowed to push. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
