Kevin Kofler wrote:
Josh Boyer <jwboyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
I have another proposal I'm in the middle of writing for how to deal
with negative karma votes. It's essentially "negative karma votes
require a bugzilla entry".
That's a bad idea, the reason for a negative karma vote is not always a bug,
for example, packages can be -1ed for reasons like "this shouldn't go out
before package Y goes out, please either add Y to this update or hold it until
the Y update gets pushed".
Wouldn't those be logged in users though (or at least.. should be). Maybe only
anon negative karma votes should need a bz entry with them?
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
