Well, in that case any of those .static symlinks should be properly built static in their respective .spec/RPMs they reside from. Maybe another item for the Sbin project? > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-devel-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:fedora-devel-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of > Benny Amorsen > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 5:07 PM > To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: few ideas how to make fedora better as a desktop > > > "Shawn Starr" <sstarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Top posting kills kittens. > > > Well, if you did a ldd on a unix box you'd notice binaries > in /sbin were staticly built. > > Depends how you define Unix then. I don't have any actual Unix > certified OS's around, but Fedora certainly doesn't link everything in > /sbin statically. > > My favourite: > > $ ldd /sbin/dump.static > linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00110000) > libext2fs.so.2 => /lib/libext2fs.so.2 (0x00ca6000) > libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00d0d000) > libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x0058e000) > libbz2.so.1 => /lib/libbz2.so.1 (0x00cfa000) > libblkid.so.1 => /lib/libblkid.so.1 (0x00c66000) > libuuid.so.1 => /lib/libuuid.so.1 (0x00c8a000) > libdevmapper.so.1.02 => /lib/libdevmapper.so.1.02 (0x0060e000) > libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0x00336000) > libsepol.so.1 => /lib/libsepol.so.1 (0x00765000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x003e6000) > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0056c000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x003c7000) > > (Yes that's cheating, /sbin/dump.static is a symlink. But still > funny.) > > > /Benny > > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
