On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 09:05 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Shawn Starr <sstarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > Well, you might know the history, but A lot of newcomers to > Linux don't. It's nice and dandy to change things and I fully > agree that we shouldn't be beholden to the FHS structure. > > So in your estimation, LSB compliance isn't worth keeping? > Oh cmon - that's a false dichotomy. it's not one or the other. You can not be beholden to the fhs and maintain lsb compliance with a small set of symlinks. c'mon jeff. You know better than that. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
