Bill Nottingham <notting <at> redhat.com> writes:
> I'm open to better ideas, though - should we ship a trimmed inittab that
> contains *only* the initdefault line? Should we introduce a new configuration
> flag somewhere else? Does it really matter in the long run?
I think the hack to parse inittab for initdefault is a better solution because
it's backwards-compatible. What do we gain from inventing a new file with a new
setting when we can just use the existing one?
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
