Re: inittab vs. /etc/sysconfig/init for runlevel 3/5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:53:31PM +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:56:40 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 
> > I'm open to better ideas, though - should we ship a trimmed inittab
> > that contains *only* the initdefault line? Should we introduce a new
> > configuration flag somewhere else? Does it really matter in the long
> > run?
> 
> At the very least leave an inittab file that contains a note that it
> is not used anymore. Much better than having to find out the new
> structure on your own.

Yes, it should have a comment pointing to /etc/sysconfig/init. And on a
related note where can you configure the starting of mingetty/agettty
processes for serial consoles / text consoles, and where do you override
the default C-A-D handling ?

Dan.
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux