Le mercredi 26 mars 2008 à 12:39 -0500, Les Mikesell a écrit : > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Jonathan Underwood (jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx) said: > >>> Why not simplify the world and put everything in /bin and /usr/bin, > >>> making /sbin and /usr/sbin symlinks for backwards compatibility? > >>> Whatever purpose someone thought the s- versions might have ever served > >>> flies out the window when the the administrator and the only user are > >>> one and the same person who is just confused by sometimes having > >>> commands work and sometimes not. > >> Seems entirely reasonable. > > > > Because it's changing 500 packages, and you can't do the replacement > > sanely in RPM anyway. > > Why does a package need to know if a directory is a symlink or not > unless it is the one that creates it? Are we 100% sure there is no collision between /bin and /sbin contents today ? -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
