Benjamin Kreuter wrote:
In the context of trying to ship a free kernel, but not cripple half our users' systems, it makes sense. Why should proprietary drivers for hardware the user doesn't even have been there? Perhaps the user will need them in future, but them, why not just make a package that is clearly labeled and easy to find?
In the context of a user wanting his system to be free from using proprietary drivers... how can it possibly 'hurt' him to have drivers for hardware he doesn't even have be present on his disk. This thread and effort seems entirely pointless to me.
If the user who is so concerned with their freedom actually has hardware that does not need or benefit from these bits, then they aren't being used. What they use is free software whether there are proprietary bits somewhere on the disk or not... 'shipping' bits that don't get used is completely innocuous.
-- Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3 No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer ---- ---- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
