On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 08:43 +0000, Caolan McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 08:29 +0000, Rawhide wrote: > > libsexy-0.1.11-5.fc9 > > -------------------- > > * Mon Mar 24 2008 Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.1.11-5 > > - Update require from enchant to enchant-aspell. (#437797) > > I would hope (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary) > that there isn't generally a need to require enchant-aspell, but to just > require enchant and that "things just work". Doesn't seem to be the case. > Maybe the problem here is that there needs to be a require on > hunspell-en if libsexy demands the existence of e.g. at least the > english dictionaries. Probably. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
