On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 19:28 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Friday 21 March 2008, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 14:57 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > On Friday 21 March 2008, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > See > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23c > > >ed8cecc219d8f73926e9755 (end of "desktop-file-install usage" chapter). > > > > Except that the vendor shouldn't have been used in the first place, > > Why? It's recommended by the freedesktop.org desktop menu spec, and more than > recommended by the Fedora packaging guidelines. What's the problem that > needed fixing? It doesn't match upstream. When I install from source, I end up with 2 icons in the menus and it pisses me off. > > And as Rex mentioned, it's in between releases. > > *sigh* > > Between releases or not, I think Fedora has enough problems not breaking > things between updates without maintainers intentionally inflicting more of > them. That's a minor inconvenience more than anything else... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
