Patrice Dumas <pertusus <at> free.fr> writes:
> I don't really get it. There are many people in favor of blocking
> packages until a guideline is done (at least I am, until it becomes
> easier to force a packager to fix his package post import), they will
> report to FESCO when the packaging of a kind of packages is a mess (as
> it was for java packages).
If they notice... Not all technologies are as prominent as Java.
> Part of fedora objective is also best quality in packaging. I don't know
> if it is written somewhere, though.
But there's a fine line to walk there: having a perfectly-packaged kernel 1.0
is completely useless. We can't sacrifice being current entirely in the name of
packaging quality.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
