Re: PackageKit and default update strategy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robin Norwood wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:47:49 -0400
Robin Norwood <rnorwood@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Here's the current bug lust, please check it before you file.

Well, I guess it's finally time to come clean and admit to myself, and
the world, that I have bug lust.

LoL. Well one thing I'd like to see get working is the ability to turn on skipping broken packages. I've had a very hard time trying to help test PK because of the constant group of broken packages in rawhide, so that just doing an 'update' fails. For specifics I guess I'll try to narrow things down and get some bugs filed to help make it work.

For the most part, I've just been using yum instead so that updates actually go through.

--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
 gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
----                                                                       ----

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux