Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:02:21 -0800
"Jeff Spaleta" <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That was the new one that went to updates-testing yesterday.
The people whose bugs got fixed were outvoted.
Whoa....it got unpushed in like a day? I thought it was suppose to be
given a week and then be unpushed.
If its just trigger an unpush from testing as soon as karma trips the
negative value....without a grace period for more reports to come
in..that's a problem.
*Handwave*
I have a todo to write up a generic proposal for this issue. Look for
something tomorrow.
Cool. I would think a package in updates-testing should stay there quite a long
time even with neg-karma adding up, but should just never make it out of testing
to stable. Those testing should be able to handle backing out a package that
disrupts their machines, and just not updating it again.
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
