On 12 Mar 2008 11:42:22 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If you have suggestions for the summary format, we can consider them > at the next meeting. I've a couple of suggestions for the packaging committee to consider in an effort to prevent this sort of flame damage in the future. For items that are not on your committee's agenda for discussion, but come up during the meeting that as a group you don't feel are ready for a vote.... your committee might think about voting to table the issue until a formal proposal/community discussion is in place instead of voting yes/no. You then list the item as tabled and needing a formal proposal and community discussion period in your summary. Such summary items might produce a list discussion with much smaller pitchforks and much cooler torches. You might even consider having a committee policy that any item that comes up in discussion that can't be unanimously agreed on by the end of that meeting automatically gets tabled until a formal, community vetted proposal gets put forward on a subsequent meeting agenda where you can do a formal vote. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
