Re: Including RPM's for older versions of firefox (and other applications)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 19:11 -0700, Andrew Farris wrote:
> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>>> "AF" == Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > 
> > AF> The upstream tarball releases (ff 2.0.0.12 for instance) do not
> > AF> work due to missing libstdc++.so.5.
> > 
> > yum install libstdc++.so.5
> > 
> > Even in rawhide this should get you the proper compat-libstdc++-33
> > package.
> 
> Aha thanks.  I was under the impression that wasn't there but of course..
> didn't look.  It works just fine.

So does this mean you might be willing to support/maintain this for f9?

I'm happy to help but to be honest I don't code at that sort of level.
My contributions to fedora are meager and include testing rawhide and
trying to file bugs when I can, along with the occasional chitchat on
the lists.


R 
-- 
"It's a fine line between denial and faith.
 It's much better on my side"

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux