On Mon March 10 2008, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 02:50:15PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > On 03/10/2008 02:36 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 14:15 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > >> People should file bugs instead of just posting a comment in Bodhi. > > >> Bodhi does not provide the same features as bugzilla for tracking > > >> problems -- for example this weekend we had one person in Bodhi > > >> posting the same -1 karma message three times in a row... > > > > > > Why not both? Reference the bug in a karma posting. > > > > Negative karma postings should require a bug number... > > Absolutely. We shouldn't be using Bohdi to track bugs against updates - > they should all be in BZ. And if we're going to allow -ve karma to revert a > bug fix, then it must be accompanied by a bug report indicating what's > wrong. Imho it should be possible to portion out bad karma via Bugzilla, i.e. indicating in a bug report, that the bug is caused by an update for the regarding package. I find it very annoying to use bodhi after I filed a bug report and also to have to report it for every release seperately in bodhi, e.g. when I found a bug in a package for F8 and the same version was also released as an update for F7. And also when it is possible to provide a bugzilla for a comment in bodhi, this comment should also be posted to bugzilla to the regarding bug report imho. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
