Re: rawhide report: 20080307 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 08:57:16 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:

> On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 14:25 +0100, Martin Nagy wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the fact that broken dependencies are now on top is nice, but, could it 
> > be done so that we would have "Broken deps for all architectures" to 
> > avoid duplicity?
> 
> Got patches?

What does that mean, "Broken deps for all architectures"?
Can you give an example and reformat the rawhide report?
Do you want to squeeze the details into a single table and make
it less readable only to shorten it? Note that you would still
need to put the pkg arch and repo arch somewhere.
Library SONAMEs between 32-bit and 64-bit platforms differ.
ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch and multi-lib cause broken dependencies on
only a subset of the platforms.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux