On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 08:57:16 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 14:25 +0100, Martin Nagy wrote: > > Hi, > > the fact that broken dependencies are now on top is nice, but, could it > > be done so that we would have "Broken deps for all architectures" to > > avoid duplicity? > > Got patches? What does that mean, "Broken deps for all architectures"? Can you give an example and reformat the rawhide report? Do you want to squeeze the details into a single table and make it less readable only to shorten it? Note that you would still need to put the pkg arch and repo arch somewhere. Library SONAMEs between 32-bit and 64-bit platforms differ. ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch and multi-lib cause broken dependencies on only a subset of the platforms. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
